BESS Feasibility Dashboard
This dashboard summarizes the technical and economic performance of the simulated BESS configurations.
It highlights the most relevant investment indicators, compares BESS capacities, and shows how the economic value is generated through avoided energy cost, peak shaving, grid charging cost, export opportunity cost and degradation cost.
Executive Summary
The simulation identifies the BESS configurations that maximize capital efficiency, value creation and annual savings.
Best IRR (%)
Best NPV (k€)
Shortest Payback (years)
Max Annual Saving (k€)
Best Configuration by Objective
Summary Table by BESS Size
The table compares the main investment indicators for each BESS capacity.
Economic Summary by BESS Capacity
The recommended configuration is the 2.0 MWh BESS, as it maximizes NPV while maintaining a strong IRR and a payback below five years. Larger capacity increases annual savings but reduces total value creation, indicating diminishing marginal returns beyond 2.0 MWh.
NPV vs. BESS Capacity
NPV is the main value-creation indicator.
The economically optimal configuration is the one with the highest positive NPV under the assumed discount rate.
IRR and Payback
IRR measures capital efficiency, while payback measures how quickly the initial investment is recovered.
BESS Charge / Discharge Profile by Hour of Day
This chart shows when the BESS tends to charge and discharge during the day.
Charging is shown below zero. Discharging is shown above zero.
Value Decomposition
The Sankey chart decomposes the annual economic value of the selected optimal configuration.
The chart starts from the gross benefit and shows how costs reduce it to the final net value.
Gross Benefit (k€)
Total Costs (k€)
Net Value (k€)